COMMON sense suggests that when lighting is poor, due to bad weather or time of day, then cars and cycles should have lights on. Why is this?

Strangely enough, it is so other road users can see them and which reduces the risk of accidents (which could be fatal).

So, what is the thought process of cyclists and drivers who don't bother?

Perhaps they think it costs them money to switch their lights on, or maybe they don't think they need to because they can see everyone else OK (possibly because others have their lights on), or is it they don't know where their light switch is, or maybe they simply can't be bothered!

I dearly wish it was made a crime to drive without lights on when visibility is poor.

However, I also wish it was law for all vehicles and cycles to be equipped with a light meter which would scream when lighting conditions were at a certain level, reminding the driver/cyclist that they are fast becoming 'invisible' to other road users (and maybe pedestrians).

So, please THINK when you get into your vehicle or onto your bike - if visibility isn't that good then why not put your lights on - it will not cost you a penny but it may just save someone crashing into you.

Ian Norton

Penarth