CYCLING is a desirable form of transport, at least in theory. Desirable because of the green virtues of this two-wheeled (sometimes three) method of travel.

Yet – sometimes self-righteous – cyclists should bear in mind the energy costs of the manufacture, storages, distribution and repair of their bikes. Walking gives rise to fewer of these costs.

From a safety point of view, I understand the reluctance of cyclists to use roads where there maybe no dedicated cycle paths.

And the number of cyclists killed on the road over the years by drivers of cars and lorries is really shocking. Two wrongs do not make a right however.

To exaggerate a little, if motorists terrorise cyclists on roads, cyclists are capable of terrorising pedestrians on pavements and ‘trails’ designed for cyclists and pedestrians. This will not do.

I hesitate to walk on the Taff Trail in Cardiff because of the many inconsiderate cyclists. Their speed is frequently excessive, they do not use bells to warn of their presence (if they ever have bells), nor do they call out as they approach.

I seriously suggest that cyclists ought to be brought into a proper legal framework, just like motorists, who pay road tax, insurance and need MoTs after three years. Motor vehicle taxation does not just raise money for the government but enables a register of owners.

We badly need a bike rider registration authority with an annual fee of at least £10-£20.

Third party insurance for cyclists should probably become compulsory. The matter is serious.

Finally, it seems obvious to me that enforcement of rules against errant cyclists where they exist eg. traffic lights observance, is somewhat too lax. Something should be done as a matter of priority.

Michael O'Neill

Railway Terrace

Penarth